|
|
|||||
|
WHO SHOULD PARTICIPATE: This activity has been designed to
meet the educational needs of MRO’s within Federally Regulated (DOT 49 CFR
Part 40) and non-regulated drug testing programs.
MONOGRAPH LEARNING OBJECTIVES: At the conclusion of this activity,
participants should be able to: §
Advise employers and others about
the pros and cons of different specimens for drug testing §
Select appropriate specimens for
different types of drug tests §
Interpret workplace drug test
results from alternative specimens §
Integrate point of collection test (POCT)
devices into workplace testing programs |
When
workplace drug testing became widespread in the 1980s, urine was favored
because of large-scale experience in military and drug treatment programs. Urine was also favored over the apparent
alternative of blood because urine was less invasive, less infectious,
identified use over a longer period of time, and contained drugs and
metabolites in higher concentrations.
Today, urine remains the most common choice for workplace drug
testing, even as tests of hair, oral fluid, and sweat have become affordable
and reliable. Rather
than trying to decide if one specimen is better than
|
||||
|
MROCC’s CME program based on this monograph provides MROs with
the most up-to-date and practical information associated with alternative
specimens for workplace drug testing.
The CMEs from this monograph will
fulfill a portion of both DOT and MROCC certification requirements This
activity has been developed for physicians who serve as Certified Medical
Review Officers (MROs) within Regulated (DOT Regulation 49 CFR Part 40) and
Non-Regulated drug testing programs. Up to 4 Category 1 CME credit hours may be obtained through
this activity.
|
|||||